What Does 1 Corinthians 13:3 Mean?

And if I feed out in morsels all that lies under my hand, and if I hand over my body that I may boast, but do not hold love, it helps me nothing.
1 Corinthians 13:3 · SDV
Key words are shown with the Hebrew or Greek and what each word meant.

Selah Decoded Version The Selah Decoded Version renders what the Hebrew and Greek words meant to the people who first heard them.

This verse in the King James

King James wording
And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

Giving everything is not the same as love being present.

You can give away all you own to feed the poor and surrender your body to burning, yet without love you receive no benefit. The verse speaks now by separating the scale of a gift from the love present in it. Its wording concerns what benefits the giver; it does not erase the food’s help to the poor.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

It undoes the belief that the scale, cost, or pain of a sacrifice proves the giver’s love or secures benefit for the giver.

ἀγάπην

agapēn

GROWS FROM

ἀγαπ-

love; to love or regard with love

The Greek word names love itself, not the amount given. Its word family spans loving and being beloved, so the verse distinguishes the visible gift from the love that may or may not be present in it.

ALSO GROWS

agapaō: to love, regard with love

ἀγαπάω

This verb shares the stem and shows that the word here belongs to the language of loving, not simply giving.

agapētos: beloved, dear

ἀγαπητός

This related word names someone held in love, opening agapē toward a bond between persons rather than a measure of generosity.

ὠφελοῦμαι

ōpheloumai

GROWS FROM

ὠφελ-

to help, benefit, or be useful

“helps” in this verse is ōpheloumai. The Greek phrase means that the giver is benefited in nothing. The verse does not say the poor receive nothing from the food; it separates the gift’s help to them from any benefit the giver receives.

ALSO GROWS

ophelos: benefit, advantage

ὄφελος

This related noun names the benefit the verse says the giver does not receive.

ōphelimos: useful, beneficial

ὠφέλιμος

This adjective belongs to the same word family and sharpens the question of whether the act actually benefits its giver.

Outward offerings cannot substitute for the inward reality they are meant to express.

And Samuel said, Does the LORD delight in rising offerings and slaughtered offerings as much as in hearing and responding to the voice of the LORD? Behold, hearing and responding is better than a slaughtered offering; to prick the ear is better than the fat of rams.
1 Samuel 15:22 · SDVBurnt offerings do not stand in for hearkening; the costly act cannot replace the response named in the verse.
For I delight in faithful love and not slaughter, and the knowledge of God more than the ascending offerings.
Hosea 6:6 · SDVThe verse places faithful love and knowing God above burnt offerings, naming what an offering alone cannot supply.
Little children, let us not love in word, nor in the tongue, but in works and in truth.
1 John 3:18 · SDVLove’s name alone is not its substance; the verse joins it to deed and truth.
And one of you says to them, Go in wholeness, be warmed and filled, but you do not give them what the body needs. What is the profit?
James 2:16 · SDV

James asks ⁨τί τὸ ὄφελος⁩ (ti to ophelos, “what benefit?”), from the same Greek word family as ⁨ὠφελοῦμαι⁩ (ōpheloumai, “I am benefited”) here. There, kind words without food do not benefit the hungry; here, even food and bodily sacrifice bring the giver no benefit without love.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us

1 Corinthians 13:3 Meaning