What Does 2 Kings 21:20 Mean in the King James?
And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as his father Manasseh did.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
Amon repeats his father’s conduct: the verse names a pattern passed on through action, with Amon still the one who acts.
THE MEANING
A harmful pattern can arrive already rehearsed, then become present again through the next person’s choices. Manasseh’s conduct provides the model, but Amon is the one who repeats it. The LORD’s sight holds the act clearly in view.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
It undoes the belief that a pattern ends when the person who began it is gone; Amon makes his father’s conduct present again.
THE ROOT
וַיַּעַשׂ
vayyaʿas
GROWS FROM
עשה
ʿ-ś-h
To do or make; to bring an action into effect.
The Hebrew repeats the same root for Amon and Manasseh: וַיַּעַשׂ … עָשָׂה, “he did … he did.” That shared verb makes their likeness an enacted choice: the son repeats the father’s deed, while remaining the one who does it.
ALSO GROWS
maʿăśeh: Deed, work, or action.
מַעֲשֶׂה
The root’s noun form makes the action concrete: what is repeated is a deed, not merely a resemblance.
ʿōśeh: One who does or makes.
עֹשֶׂה
This form brings the actor into view, as the verse names both Amon and his father as doers.
רַע
raʿ
GROWS FROM
רעע
r-ʿ-ʿ
To be bad or harmful; the root family can name badness and harm.
This word names moral wrong, while its root family can also describe trouble or calamity, holding wrong close to its damaging character. Here it is conduct judged evil in the LORD’s sight.
ALSO GROWS
rōaʿ: Badness or evil.
רֹעַ
This noun form keeps the verse’s judgment tied to the quality of the conduct.
rāʿāh: Evil, trouble, or calamity.
רָעָה
The wider root family includes harmful outcomes, giving “evil” the weight of what damages.
מְנַשֶּׁה
Mĕnaššeh
GROWS FROM
נשה
n-š-h
To forget; in the naming phrase, to cause someone to forget.
The name Manasseh is linked in Genesis 41:51 to the language of being made to forget. Here, the conduct associated with the name is not forgotten: his son repeats it, giving the root’s language a striking counterpoint.
ALSO GROWS
nāšāh: To forget.
נָשָׁה
This is the verb family behind the naming explanation, connecting Manasseh’s name with forgetting.
naššānî: He has made me forget.
נַשַּׁנִי
This form appears in the naming explanation in Genesis 41:51; beside this verse, its language of forgetting meets a pattern that remains active through Amon.
THE PATTERN
A parent’s conduct can become a child’s enacted pattern, while each person remains responsible for the act they themselves do.
And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as his fathers had done: he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.THE THREAD
Because Manasseh king of Judah hath done these abominations, and hath done wickedly above all that the Amorites did, which were before him, and hath made Judah also to sin with his idols:This verse names Manasseh’s deeds with the Hebrew root עשה (ʿāśāh, “do, make”), the same root repeated for Amon and his father here. The repeated root turns succession into enacted likeness: the father’s deeds become a pattern the son performs.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us