What Does 2 Kings 3:23 Mean in the King James?
And they said, This is blood: the kings are surely slain, and they have smitten one another: now therefore, Moab, to the spoil.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
What they call blood becomes a story of victory, and that story becomes permission to plunder.
THE MEANING
You can watch a visible sign harden into a verdict: red water becomes blood, blood becomes proof that the kings are dead, and that conclusion becomes a call to seize spoil. The verse exposes how an assumption can move straight into violence before its cause is known. The rush to plunder is part of the misreading, not an afterthought.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
What looks like proof must be the whole story.
THE ROOT
לַשָּׁלָל
la-shalal
GROWS FROM
שלל
sh-l-l
To plunder; to take as spoil.
“spoil” in this verse is la-shalal. The word points to stripping away what belongs to another. Their mistaken conclusion turns at once into a claim on Moab’s possessions; plunder is built into the response, not an incidental reward.
ALSO GROWS
shalal: Booty, spoil, plunder.
שָׁלָל
This is the noun behind the call to take what they believe the defeated kings have left behind.
shalal: To plunder, take as spoil.
שָׁלַל
The related verb makes the taking active: their conclusion immediately becomes an act of seizure.
וַיַּכּוּ
vayyakku
GROWS FROM
נכה
n-k-h
To strike or smite.
“smitten” in this verse is vayyakku. The verb keeps their explanation physical: they imagine each side striking the other. The same root can name a blow and what is stricken, so their account turns an unseen battle into an assumed result.
ALSO GROWS
makkah: A blow, stroke, or plague.
מַכָּה
This branch makes the imagined violence concrete: they picture blows exchanged between the kings’ forces.
mukkeh: One who is struck or afflicted.
מֻכֶּה
This form describes the one on the receiving end of the strike they assume has happened.
THE PATTERN
A vivid sign can be mistaken for a complete explanation, and that explanation can drive what follows.
And he knew it, and said, It is my son’s coat; an evil beast hath devoured him; Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces.He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.And when the barbarians saw the venomous beast hang on his hand, they said among themselves, No doubt this man is a murderer, whom, though he hath escaped the sea, yet vengeance suffereth not to live.THE THREAD
And they took Joseph’s coat, and killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the coat in the blood;The same Hebrew word דָּם (dam, blood) stands behind blood in both verses. In Genesis, blood is placed on a coat to prompt a conclusion; here, red water is taken as proof of death, and that inference turns toward plunder. In both, the blood is visible, but its cause is not.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us