What Does Ezra 9:10 Mean in the King James?

And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments,
Ezra 9:10 · KJV
The analysis reads the King James wording.

King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.

This verse in the Selah Decoded Version

The verse holds one departure beside another: God has not forsaken them, yet they have forsaken God’s instruction.

The reader reaches the moment when explanation runs out: the breach is named plainly before God. It is a departure from instruction already given, not simply a failure to know what was asked. The question “what shall we say?” lets the truth stand without excuse.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

It undoes the belief that the breach is only confusion: the speaker names it as forsaking, a real departure from what was given.

עָזַבְנוּ

ʿāzavnū

GROWS FROM

עזב

ʿ-z-b

to leave, abandon, forsake

The root means departure: the speakers have left behind what God instructed. The same root appears in the previous verse, where God “hath not forsaken” them; the passage turns the same word around to show the contrast between their departure and the one they have not suffered.

ALSO GROWS

ʿāzav: to leave or forsake

עָזַב

The same verb describes God not abandoning the speakers in Ezra 9:9, making the contrast immediate.

ʿāzuv: left, forsaken, abandoned

עָזוּב

This related form names the state that follows departure, showing that forsaking is more than a passing mistake.

מִצְוֹתֶיךָ

miṣvōteḵā

GROWS FROM

צוה

ṣ-w-h

to command, charge, direct

“Commandments” comes from the root ⁨צוה⁩ (ṣ-w-h, command or charge), so what has been forsaken is an instruction entrusted to them. The word’s branch ⁨מִצְוָה⁩ (miṣvāh, commandment) keeps the verse’s focus on a known charge, rather than a vague sense of failure.

ALSO GROWS

miṣvāh: commandment, command

מִצְוָה

This singular form shares the seed of “commandments,” showing the plural as many particular charges.

ṣiwwāh: commanded, charged

צִוָּה

This verb form makes the root’s action clear: the commandments are what was given as a charge.

The language of forsaking makes fidelity visible as staying with what has been given, and departure as a real relational break.

And he went out to meet Asa, and said unto him, Hear ye me, Asa, and all Judah and Benjamin; The LORD is with you, while ye be with him; and if ye seek him, he will be found of you; but if ye forsake him, he will forsake you.
2 Chronicles 15:2 · KJVThe repeated word “forsake” makes departure reciprocal and relational, as it does in Ezra’s confession.
They had almost consumed me upon earth; but I forsook not thy precepts.
Psalm 119:87 · KJVThe speaker describes staying with instruction even under pressure, the inverse of the departure named in Ezra.
Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Hebrews 13:5 · KJVThe promise that God will not leave or forsake gives the same language of departure a present assurance.
For we were bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us in the sight of the kings of Persia, to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God, and to repair the desolations thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem.
Ezra 9:9 · KJV

Both verses use ⁨עָזַב⁩ (ʿāzav, leave or forsake): in 9:9 God has not abandoned them in bondage; in 9:10 they say they have abandoned God’s commandments. The repeated root makes the confession a mirror: they name the abandonment they have not received.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us

Ezra 9:10 KJV Meaning