What Does Genesis 43:32 Mean in the King James?

And they set on for him by himself, and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians, which did eat with him, by themselves: because the Egyptians might not eat bread with the Hebrews; for that is an abomination unto the Egyptians.
Genesis 43:32 · KJV
The analysis reads the King James wording.

King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.

This verse in the Selah Decoded Version

One Hebrew root for being alone is repeated across all three groups, so the boundary is built into the seating before anyone eats.

You can be close enough to share a room and still remain outside another group’s table. Here, each party is served apart, and the stated reason is the Egyptians’ revulsion at eating with the Hebrews.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

Being present at the same meal does not guarantee shared belonging; the arrangement can expose exclusion where proximity might suggest fellowship.

לְבַדּוֹ

ləvaddō

GROWS FROM

בדד

b-d-d

to be alone, apart, or solitary

“by himself / by themselves” in this verse is ləvaddō. English preserves the repeated “by himself/by themselves,” but Hebrew uses forms of one apartness-root for Joseph, his brothers, and the Egyptians. The shared root makes separation the meal’s governing arrangement, not a passing detail.

ALSO GROWS

bādād: alone, solitary

בָּדָד

This form shows the root’s basic sense: each group occupies its own space at the meal.

ləvaḏ: apart, alone

לְבַד

This form appears within ⁨לְבַדּוֹ⁩ and ⁨לְבַדָּם⁩, tying the three separate placements to one repeated idea.

תּוֹעֵבָה

tōʿēvāh

GROWS FROM

תעב

t-ʿ-b

to abhor or regard with revulsion

“abomination” in this verse is tōʿēvāh. The word names more than a seating custom: the stated boundary is grounded in abhorrence. Its root connects the act of abhorring with the thing regarded as detestable, making revulsion the force behind this separation.

ALSO GROWS

tāʿav: to abhor, detest

תָּעַב

The verb names the response that underlies the noun used for what is considered an abomination.

tōʿăvōt: abhorrences, detestable things

תּוֹעֲבוֹת

This plural form carries the same judgment into a category of things regarded as abhorrent, showing how revulsion can become a shared boundary.

Food and communal practices make the boundaries of belonging visible in who is received together and who is kept apart.

And Moses said, It is not meet so to do; for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to the LORD our God: lo, shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes, and will they not stone us?
Exodus 8:26 · KJVThe same Egyptian category of abhorrence marks a boundary around what can be done in their sight.
For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision.
Galatians 2:12 · KJVPeter’s withdrawal from eating with the Gentiles turns social pressure into a visible boundary at the table.
For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken.
1 Corinthians 11:21 · KJVThe divided meal exposes who is being included in the shared food and who is left without it.
That ye shall say, Thy servants’ trade hath been about cattle from our youth even until now, both we, and also our fathers: that ye may dwell in the land of Goshen; for every shepherd is an abomination unto the Egyptians.
Genesis 46:34 · KJV

The same Hebrew noun ⁨תּוֹעֵבָה⁩ (tōʿēvāh, an abhorrent thing) describes how the Egyptians regard shepherds. The shared root links the separated meal to a wider boundary: revulsion shapes who can share space and where another group may live.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us

Genesis 43:32 KJV Meaning