What Does Hebrews 1:5 Mean in the King James?
For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
The verse distinguishes the Son from every messenger by making sonship a direct address from the Father, not a message carried by angels.
THE MEANING
The verse sets the Son apart from the messengers through the Father’s own words: “my Son” and “a Father.” The begetting is spoken of as completed, while the Father’s address names a relationship that stands now. The reader meets a distinction of belonging, not merely rank.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
It undoes the idea that the Son is only one more messenger, however exalted; the verse gives him a filial relation the messengers are not given.
THE ROOT
γεγέννηκά
gegenneka
GROWS FROM
γενν- (genn-), from γεννάω (gennaō)
Beget, bring forth.
“begotten” in this verse is gegenneka. The Greek form is a perfect tense: the begetting is spoken of as completed, with its result standing in the present address. The word holds origin and continuing identity together.
ALSO GROWS
gennēma: Offspring, what has been brought forth.
γέννημα
It makes the begetting concrete as the one brought forth, echoing the verse’s direct naming of the Son.
genea: Generation, lineage, or kind.
γενεά
It carries the same seed into belonging across a line, illuminating the relation named by “my Son.”
genesis: Origin or birth.
γένεσις
It shows how this word family joins coming forth with the question of origin.
ἀγγέλων
angelōn
GROWS FROM
ἀγγελ-
angel-
Message; announcing or carrying a message.
“angels” in this verse is angelōn. The word names messengers, beings identified by what they carry or announce. Against that role, “my Son” marks a different relation, not merely a higher messenger rank.
ALSO GROWS
angelos: Messenger.
ἄγγελος
This is the singular form behind “angels”; the contrast turns on messenger role versus the Son’s direct address.
angelia: Message or announcement.
ἀγγελία
It shows the message-bearing sense within the word family that English “angel” can hide.
angellō: Announce, report.
ἀγγέλλω
This verb makes explicit the action associated with the messenger word family.
πατέρα
patera
GROWS FROM
πατρ- (patr-), from πατήρ (patēr)
Father; the one named as parent or ancestor.
The Father’s name here is relational: “I will be to him” is answered by “he shall be to me.” The wording presents belonging as mutual address, not a title detached from relationship.
ALSO GROWS
patria: Family, lineage, or family line.
πατριά
It extends fatherhood into the belonging of a household or line.
patrikos: Paternal, belonging to a father.
πατρικός
It carries the Father’s name into what bears or reflects that relationship.
THE PATTERN
The Father’s direct naming of the Son marks a relation no messenger receives.
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men:And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.THE THREAD
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.This is the line Hebrews quotes, carrying the same begetting language into its contrast between the Son and the messengers. The first-person words make the source of the naming clear: the Son is named by the Father.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us
