What Does John 10:13 Mean in the King James?

The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.
John 10:13 · KJV
The analysis reads the King James wording.

King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.

This verse in the Selah Decoded Version

The danger does not make the hireling indifferent; it reveals that the sheep never became what mattered to him.

When danger arrives, the hireling’s choice makes his measure visible: he leaves because the sheep do not matter to him. A person can occupy a role of care while remaining untouched by the lives entrusted to that role.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

It undoes the belief that a title, position, or paid duty guarantees care; someone can stand among the sheep and still not have them matter.

μισθωτός

misthōtos

GROWS FROM

μισθ-

misth-

wage, pay, compensation

The word names someone hired for wages, marking the relation by its compensation. The verse then makes a sharper distinction: this hireling’s role does not mean the sheep matter to him.

ALSO GROWS

misthos: wage, pay, reward

μισθός

The hired worker’s name shares its seed with the word for wages, bringing compensation into view.

misthoō: to hire or pay wages

μισθόω

The same root names the act of hiring, showing how a work role can be established without itself guaranteeing care.

μέλει

melei

GROWS FROM

μέλ-

mel-

matter, be a concern

“careth not” in this verse is melei. The phrase says more than that the hireling fails to show care: the sheep do not matter to him. Beside the word for a wage worker, it reveals the gap between being employed to tend the sheep and having them become a true concern.

ALSO GROWS

melēma: care, concern

μέλημα

This related word makes explicit the sense of something occupying a person’s concern.

ameleō: to neglect, disregard

ἀμελέω

This related verb names the neglect that follows when something is not treated as a concern.

When someone entrusted with the vulnerable serves self-interest instead of the flock, abandonment exposes what the role was really serving.

Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks?
Ezekiel 34:2 · KJVThe shepherds’ self-feeding shows the same failure: their own gain takes the place of concern for the flock.
Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.
Zechariah 11:17 · KJVThe shepherd who abandons the flock is named as a failed caretaker, and the verse holds the consequences without softening them.
Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind;
1 Peter 5:2 · KJVThe contrast between willing oversight and service for profit makes motive part of what care means.
I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
John 10:11 · KJV

The hireling flees when danger threatens the sheep; here, the good shepherd gives his own life for them. The two lines reveal opposite measures of care: one leaves when the cost rises, while the other stays at the cost of his life.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us

John 10:13 KJV Meaning