What Does Joshua 7:7 Mean in the King James?
And Joshua said, Alas, O Lord GOD, wherefore hast thou at all brought this people over Jordan, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us? would to God we had been content, and dwelt on the other side Jordan!
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
The same Hebrew root names both being brought across and the far side, binding the crossing itself to the place Joshua wishes he had stayed.
THE MEANING
A crossing that seemed to lead forward can now feel like being placed into another’s hand; the passage holds movement and fear together. The wish to have stayed on the far bank gives voice to the present ache of fearing that the road ahead leads to loss.
THE ROOT
הַעֲבַרְתָּ
haʿavarta
GROWS FROM
ע־ב־ר
ʿ-b-r
to cross, pass over, or pass through
“brought ... over / other side” in this verse is haʿavarta. English renders “brought ... over” and “other side” as separate ideas, but both carry ע־ב־ר, the seed of crossing. The wording binds the act of crossing to the far bank Joshua wishes for, so his lament holds the passage itself alongside the danger beyond it.
ALSO GROWS
ʿavar: to cross or pass over
עָבַר
This verb is the root beneath “brought ... over,” making the action a crossing through.
ʿever: across, beyond, the far side
עֵבֶר
This form names the place on the other side, linking the crossing to the place Joshua longs for.
maʿavar: passage or crossing
מַעֲבָר
This branch can name the passage itself, keeping attention on the threshold being crossed.
לָתֵת
latet
GROWS FROM
נ־ת־ן
n-t-n
to give, set, or place
The line’s “deliver us into the hand” uses the verb “give,” with “hand” stated directly. The root adds the concrete sense of being placed under another’s power to the fear in the plea.
ALSO GROWS
natan: to give or place
נָתַן
This is the root verb behind the phrase describing what Joshua fears will happen to the people.
mattanah: a gift, something given
מַתָּנָה
The noun preserves the root’s sense of giving, showing its range beyond a single verb form.
natun: given or placed
נָתוּן
This form makes the root’s sense of being put somewhere especially clear beside “into the hand.”
לְהַאֲבִידֵנוּ
lehaʾavidenu
GROWS FROM
א־ב־ד
ʾ-b-d
to perish, vanish, or be lost
The word rendered “destroy” comes from a root that also carries the sense of perishing or being lost. That shared sense keeps the line’s fear focused on the people themselves and their threatened disappearance.
ALSO GROWS
ʾavad: to perish or be lost
אָבַד
This is the root verb behind the feared destruction in the verse.
ʾavedah: something lost
אֲבֵדָה
This noun carries the same root’s sense of loss into another form.
ʾavaddon: destruction or ruin
אֲבַדּוֹן
This branch makes explicit the destructive edge of the root used in the plea.
THE PATTERN
Scripture uses crossing water as a threshold between the side left behind and the side reached.
And the priests that bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD stood firm on dry ground in the midst of Jordan, and all the Israelites passed over on dry ground, until all the people were passed clean over Jordan.But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.And the same day, when the even was come, he saith unto them, Let us pass over unto the other side.THE THREAD
And the priests that bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD stood firm on dry ground in the midst of Jordan, and all the Israelites passed over on dry ground, until all the people were passed clean over Jordan.Joshua 3:17 uses ע־ב־ר (ʿ-b-r, to cross or pass over) for the people’s crossing, the same root heard in “brought ... over” and “beyond” in Joshua 7:7. Its return keeps the crossing and the far bank inside one word-family; here, that passage is voiced through fear of what waits beyond it.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us