What Does Leviticus 22:10 Mean in the King James?
There shall no stranger eat of the holy thing: a sojourner of the priest, or an hired servant, shall not eat of the holy thing.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
Being settled in or working for the priest’s household does not itself place someone inside its permitted share.
THE MEANING
This verse draws a boundary around set-apart food: an outsider, the priest’s resident, and a hired worker do not eat it. Residence and labor bring a person near the priest’s household, but this rule does not treat either as household belonging. The exclusion reaches the actual eating of the sacred food.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
It undoes the assumption that proximity to sacred work or a place in someone’s household automatically grants a share; this rule withholds that access.
THE ROOT
קֹדֶשׁ
qōdeš
GROWS FROM
קדש
Set apart for a distinct sacred use.
“Holy thing” can sound like a label attached to an object, but qodesh belongs to a family that also names the set-apart person, place, and act. The food is marked off as part of a distinct domain, and the verse draws a boundary around who may take it in.
ALSO GROWS
qādôš: Set apart; sacred.
קָדוֹשׁ
The same root describes the status of what is reserved for sacred use.
miqdāš: Sanctuary; a set-apart place.
מִקְדָּשׁ
The sanctuary and the food share the language of a domain marked off for sacred use.
qiddēš: Set apart; consecrate.
קִדֵּשׁ
The verb shows that set-apartness is something established, not merely a quality noticed afterward.
תּוֹשָׁב
tôšāḇ
GROWS FROM
ישב
Sit, dwell, remain settled.
“sojourner” in this verse is tôšāḇ. The Hebrew word describes a resident, not simply someone passing through. Even settled residence alongside the priest does not, in this verse, grant a share of the set-apart food.
ALSO GROWS
yāšaḇ: Sit; dwell; remain.
יָשַׁב
The resident is linked to the act of dwelling, making the distinction about settled presence clear.
môšāḇ: Dwelling; seat; settlement.
מוֹשָׁב
This branch also carries the sense of an established place, yet residence alone does not cross the boundary in the verse.
שָׂכִיר
śāḵîr
GROWS FROM
שכר
Hire for wages; pay for service.
“hired servant” in this verse is śāḵîr. The hired worker is named through the wage relationship. The verse distinguishes work performed for the household from belonging to the household that receives the sacred food.
ALSO GROWS
śāḵar: Hire; engage for wages.
שָׂכַר
The verb names the arrangement that defines the worker’s place in the household.
śāḵār: Wages; payment; recompense.
שָׂכָר
The related noun makes the paid nature of the relationship explicit, which the verse sets apart from eligibility to eat.
THE PATTERN
A share in set-apart food follows a defined household or table bond, with access governed by that bond’s terms.
But if the priest buy any soul with his money, he shall eat of it, and he that is born in his house: they shall eat of his meat.And this is thine; the heave offering of their gift, with all the wave offerings of the children of Israel: I have given them unto thee, and to thy sons and to thy daughters with thee, by a statute for ever: every one that is clean in thy house shall eat of it.Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils.THE THREAD
But if the priest buy any soul with his money, he shall eat of it, and he that is born in his house: they shall eat of his meat.The next verse makes the boundary concrete: those bought into the priest’s household and those born there eat, while the resident and wage worker do not. Access follows household status, including status defined through ownership.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us