What Does Micah 2:4 Mean in the King James?

In that day shall one take up a parable against you, and lament with a doleful lamentation, and say, We be utterly spoiled: he hath changed the portion of my people: how hath he removed it from me! turning away he hath divided our fields.
Micah 2:4 · KJV
The analysis reads the King James wording.

King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.

This verse in the Selah Decoded Version

The Hebrew calls both the people’s “portion” and the dividing of their fields by the root ⁨חל״ק⁩ (ḥ-l-q): the seizure is a reallocation of another’s share.

The verse speaks wherever another person’s inheritance is treated as available to carve up: the very act of dividing can become the divider’s own dispossession. What seemed like secure control becomes a public lament when a portion is removed and fields are split.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

It undoes the belief that control over someone else’s land secures your own portion; the dividing hand can find its own share removed.

חֵלֶק

cheleq

GROWS FROM

חלק

ḥ-l-q

To divide, apportion, or allot a share.

“portion / divided” in this verse is cheleq. Portion, ⁨חֵלֶק⁩ (cheleq), and divided, ⁨יְחַלֵּק⁩ (yechalleq), come from the same root. Hebrew links the people’s allotted share to the division of their fields: the seizure is a reallocation of what belongs to others.

ALSO GROWS

cheleq: A portion or share.

חֵלֶק

This is the word translated “portion,” the share of the people that is changed and removed.

yechalleq: He divides or apportions.

יְחַלֵּק

This is translated “divided” near the end of the verse, joining the loss of a portion to the breaking up of fields.

chelqah: A plot or parcel of land.

חֶלְקָה

This branch makes the language of shares concrete: a portion can be an actual tract of land.

שָׁדוֹד נְשַׁדֻּנוּ

shadod neshadunu

GROWS FROM

שדד

sh-d-d

To plunder, ravage, or devastate.

The Hebrew repeats the root in adjacent forms, “plundered, we are plundered,” and the KJV preserves the echo with “spoiled” twice. The lament makes plunder ring as both the harm and the condition now spoken aloud.

ALSO GROWS

shadod: Plundered or devastated.

שָׁדוֹד

This form opens the lament: “utterly spoiled.”

shod: Plunder or devastation.

שֹׁד

This noun names the violence behind the repeated “spoiled,” linking the lament to the act that causes the loss.

A share seized from another becomes a public cry, and the hand that divides is exposed to dispossession itself.

Woe to thee that spoilest, and thou wast not spoiled; and dealest treacherously, and they dealt not treacherously with thee! when thou shalt cease to spoil, thou shalt be spoiled; and when thou shalt make an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee.
Isaiah 33:1 · KJVThe same plundering root appears in both sides of the reversal: the spoiler becomes the spoiled.
And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage.
Micah 2:2 · KJVThe taking of fields and inheritance gives the division in Micah 2:4 its human cost.
Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth.
James 5:4 · KJVWhat is withheld from those who worked the fields becomes a cry that cannot be hidden.
Woe to thee that spoilest, and thou wast not spoiled; and dealest treacherously, and they dealt not treacherously with thee! when thou shalt cease to spoil, thou shalt be spoiled; and when thou shalt make an end to deal treacherously, they shall deal treacherously with thee.
Isaiah 33:1 · KJV

Isaiah uses ⁨שדד⁩ (shadad, to plunder) to say that the spoiler will be spoiled. Micah repeats the same root in “utterly spoiled,” making the loss in its lament echo the reversal Isaiah states plainly.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us