What Does Nehemiah 3:18 Mean in the King James?
After him repaired their brethren, Bavai the son of Henadad, the ruler of the half part of Keilah.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
The Hebrew word rendered “repaired” comes from “strengthen”: the wall is restored as neighboring sections are made firm by the hands that follow.
THE MEANING
Your work of repair is not solitary: one set of hands takes up the wall after another, and the whole grows firm through its adjoining parts. Each person’s portion belongs to a larger whole.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
This undoes the belief that one strong person must carry the whole work of restoration.
THE ROOT
הֶחֱזִיקוּ
hecheziqu
GROWS FROM
חזק
To be firm or strong; to strengthen or make firm.
The verb translated “repaired” carries the sense of strengthening or making firm. The wall’s repair is described through the same root that names strength: restoration makes a weakened structure able to stand.
ALSO GROWS
chazaq: Be strong, grow firm, prevail.
חָזַק
This branch names the strength that repair restores to the wall.
chizzeq: Strengthen, reinforce, make firm.
חִזֵּק
This form makes the root’s action explicit: the wall is repaired by being reinforced.
THE PATTERN
A shared whole grows stronger when people strengthen its parts and carry its work together.
Strengthen ye the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees.Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour.Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.THE THREAD
Strengthen ye the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees.Isaiah uses the same Hebrew root, חזק (chazaq, “strengthen”), that lies beneath “repaired” here. In Nehemiah it makes a wall firm; in Isaiah it names strength given to weak hands, joining the repair of a boundary to the restoration of human capacity.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us