What Does Numbers 16:35 Mean in the King James?
And there came out a fire from the LORD, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that offered incense.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
“Consumed” is the Hebrew verb “eat”: the fire does not just appear beside the offering; it devours the offerers.
THE MEANING
The LORD’s fire comes out and consumes the 250 men bringing incense. Their offering leaves them within the reach of that fire, and the violence of the scene stays explicit.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
The belief that approaching with a sacred offering guarantees safety.
THE ROOT
וַתֹּאכַל
vattoʾkhal
GROWS FROM
אכל
Eat, consume, devour.
“consumed” in this verse is vattoʾkhal. The Hebrew verb means “eat,” giving the fire the action of a devourer. The men are not merely near the flames: the verse describes them as what the fire eats.
ALSO GROWS
ʾākhal: To eat or consume.
אָכַל
The verse uses this root for the fire’s action, carrying the ordinary image of eating into a scene of destruction.
maʾakhal: Food; something eaten.
מַאֲכָל
This noun from the same root names what is eaten; here the fire is the eater and the men are what it consumes.
THE PATTERN
Scripture depicts the LORD’s fire as an active consuming force.
And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.For the LORD thy God is a consuming fire, even a jealous God.For our God is a consuming fire.THE THREAD
And there went out fire from the LORD, and devoured them, and they died before the LORD.Leviticus gives the same sequence: Nadab and Abihu bring strange fire, then the LORD’s fire devours them. The Hebrew uses the same root אכל, “eat, consume,” tying the two scenes through the image of fire eating.
This reading is from Selah Verse.
You can read any verse this way in the app, keep it as a card, and send it on.
A Bible app where you send verses from your keyboard and in Messages, and every verse has a Deep Dive.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us