What Does Numbers 19:20 Mean in the King James?
But the man that shall be unclean, and shall not purify himself, that soul shall be cut off from among the congregation, because he hath defiled the sanctuary of the LORD: the water of separation hath not been sprinkled upon him; he is unclean.
The analysis reads the King James wording.
King James Version The King James Version, first published in 1611. Selah Verse shows the standard text.
THE KEY
In Hebrew, “unclean” and “defiled” come from the same root, linking the person’s condition directly to the sanctuary’s condition.
THE MEANING
When purification remains undone, uncleanness reaches beyond the person: the sanctuary is defiled, and the living soul is cut off from the congregation. The absent sprinkling marks cleansing left incomplete, while “cut off” names a severing from communal belonging. Person, sacred space, and community remain joined in one chain.
WHAT THIS UNDOES
The belief that uncleanness affects only the individual is undone: the verse says it defiles the sanctuary and cuts the person off from the congregation.
THE ROOT
טָמֵא
ṭāmēʾ
GROWS FROM
טמא
To be ritually impure or to make impure.
“unclean / defiled” in this verse is ṭāmēʾ. English uses “unclean” for the man and “defiled” for the sanctuary, but Hebrew repeats one root. The same impurity joins his condition to what happens to the shared sacred space.
ALSO GROWS
ṭāmēʾ: Unclean or impure.
טָמֵא
This form names the man’s state and concludes the verse.
ṭimmēʾ: Defile or make impure.
טִמֵּא
This form names what the man does to the sanctuary, showing that his condition reaches beyond himself.
ṭumʾāh: Uncleanness or impurity.
טֻמְאָה
This noun makes explicit the shared condition carried by both forms in the verse.
יִתְחַטָּא
yitḥaṭṭāʾ
GROWS FROM
חטא
To miss or incur fault; in the reflexive form here, to undergo purification.
The Hebrew form rendered “purify himself” belongs to the same חטא family often rendered “sin” or “missing.” English separates these ideas, while Hebrew places the act of cleansing and the missing within one root family.
ALSO GROWS
ḥēṭ: Missing or fault.
חֵטְא
This familiar branch shares its root with the purification verb in the verse.
ḥaṭṭāʾt: Offering for the missing; a purification offering.
חַטָּאת
This branch brings the root into ritual language, where cleansing answers impurity.
yitḥaṭṭāʾ: Purify oneself in this verse.
יִתְחַטָּא
Its form shows that the root can describe the act that addresses impurity, not only the fault itself.
וְנִכְרְתָה
wenikretāh
GROWS FROM
כרת
To cut or sever.
“Cut off” carries the image of severing: the sentence removes the person from the congregation. The same root appears in the idiom “cut a covenant,” where cutting marks a binding boundary.
ALSO GROWS
kārat: Cut or sever.
כָּרַת
This is the root verb behind the sentence’s image of exclusion.
kārat berit: Cut a covenant; make a covenant.
כָּרַת בְּרִית
This familiar phrase shows the root’s role in naming a consequential boundary or bond.
THE PATTERN
Cleansing is pictured as water applied to defilement, preserving or restoring a person’s place in sacred community.
Thus shall ye separate the children of Israel from their uncleanness; that they die not in their uncleanness, when they defile my tabernacle that is among them.Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.THE THREAD
And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.Genesis 17:14 uses the same root כרת in the same judgment formula: “that soul shall be cut off from his people.” Numbers 19:20 names exclusion as a severing of the living soul from communal belonging.
Read the SDV Bible.
Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.
The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.
Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us