What Does Leviticus 27:33 Mean?

He does not search whether it is good or bad, nor does he exchange it; and if he at all exchanges it, then both it and the one given in its place are set apart, and it is not bought back.
Leviticus 27:33 · SDV
Key words are shown with the Hebrew or Greek and what each word meant.

Selah Decoded Version The Selah Decoded Version renders what the Hebrew and Greek words meant to the people who first heard them.

This verse in the King James

King James wording
He shall not search whether it be good or bad, neither shall he change it: and if he change it at all, then both it and the change thereof shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed.

A substitution does not cancel what has been set apart; the substitute joins it.

The verse draws a boundary around what is set apart: judging the animal good or bad does not reopen it to selection. If an exchange happens, both the original and its substitute remain set apart, and neither can be reclaimed.

WHAT THIS UNDOES

A more suitable replacement can undo the first animal’s consecration.

יְמִירֶנּוּ

yemirennu

GROWS FROM

מוּר

mur

To exchange or substitute, putting one thing in place of another.

Hebrew repeats the verb for exchange, foregrounding the act of substitution. The related noun ⁨תְּמוּרָה⁩ (temurah, “substitute” or “exchange”) shows that the replacement belongs to the same word family; here the exchange attaches consecration to both animals instead of transferring it from one to the other.

ALSO GROWS

hemir: To exchange or substitute.

הֵמִיר

This verb names the act the verse says cannot undo the animal’s set-apart status.

temurah: A substitute or exchange.

תְּמוּרָה

The noun names the replacement itself, which the verse includes alongside the original in the consecration.

יִגָּאֵל

yiggāʾēl

GROWS FROM

גָּאַל

ga'al

To reclaim or redeem; in some settings, to reclaim as a near kinsman.

“bought back” in this verse is yiggāʾēl. The closing word comes from a reclaiming root; ⁨גֹּאֵל⁩ (go’el, “kinsman-redeemer”) names one who reclaims on behalf of family. The verse closes that route too: neither animal can be reclaimed from its set-apart status.

ALSO GROWS

go’el: A kinsman-redeemer or one who reclaims.

גֹּאֵל

This branch makes the reclaiming sense of “redeemed” visible in the verse’s final boundary.

ge’ullah: Redemption or reclamation.

גְּאֻלָּה

This noun names the act the verse says cannot return either animal from consecration.

A designation as belonging to God is not undone by a later change in value, form, or circumstance.

He does not switch it, nor exchange it, a good for a bad, or a bad for a good; and if he at all exchanges beast for beast, then it and the one given in its place are set apart.
Leviticus 27:10 · SDVThe swap is explicit: exchanging one animal for another makes both set apart.
But the tenths of the children of Israel, which they lift up to the LORD as a lifted offering, I have given to the Levites as a holding. Therefore I have said to them, Among the children of Israel they shall have no holding.
Numbers 18:24 · SDVThe tithe is assigned to the Levites as an inheritance, marking a settled belonging.
For the favors and the calling of God are not taken back.
Romans 11:29 · SDVWhat God gives and calls is described as not withdrawn, echoing the verse’s refusal to treat consecration as reversible.
He does not switch it, nor exchange it, a good for a bad, or a bad for a good; and if he at all exchanges beast for beast, then it and the one given in its place are set apart.
Leviticus 27:10 · SDV

Both verses use ⁨מוּר⁩ (mur, “exchange or substitute”) for the attempted change. Leviticus 27:10 makes explicit what 27:33 compresses: exchanging one animal for another does not move the consecration; both remain set apart.

Read the SDV Bible.

Every verse has a Deep Dive in the app.

Get Selah Verse

The iPhone Bible app with the Selah Decoded Version.

Does something in this reading look wrong? Tell us

Leviticus 27:33 Meaning